The The law will “establish governance” of British justice by “making clear that British courts are under no obligation to obey the Strasbourg jurisprudence and are free to depart from it,” Justice Minister Dominic Raab told parliament.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is not affiliated with the EU, an international court comprising the Council’s 46 member states, although the initiative is seen as an assertion of British sovereignty following Britain’s departure from the European Union. Europe., created in 1949 and located in Strasbourg.
Raab claimed the UK had “the world’s leading judicial system” and questioned “why the Supreme Court if it is subservient to the European Court of Justice”.
The minister argued that human rights issues “have changed over time” and the proposed legislation allows the British Parliament to have the last word.
He stressed that the introduced reforms would “strengthen freedom of expression, allow extradition of foreign criminals and better protect people from dangerous criminals”.
Raab said the new law would “instill a healthy dose of common sense into the system while reinforcing the British tradition of independence”.
It’s a “dark day” for the main opposition Labor party, as the law strips the state of its obligations to protect human rights and makes it harder for victims to access the European Court of Justice.
“This is a government struggling to cover up its failures and hold others accountable. We’ve seen many Conservative MPs do this, with the European Court of Justice apologizing for a botched and dysfunctional asylum policy,” he said. Shadow of Justice, Ellie Reeves.
Winston Churchill is remembered for promoting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which resulted in the European Convention and became part of the British Act of 1998, the same year the peace agreement for Northern Ireland was signed.
Raab confirmed that the UK would sign up to the European Convention on Human Rights, despite calls from some members of the ruling party to resign.
Many human rights organizations condemned the government’s plans.
Sacha Deshmukh, director of Amnesty International UK, said: “The most powerful tool to challenge wrongdoing by government and other public bodies is being taken away from the public”.
Law Society president Stephanie Boyce called the legislation “a setback for British justice”.
“Authorities may start accepting some rights violations because these are illegal but can no longer be challenged under the Bill of Rights,” he said.
Also Read: Traces of Polio Virus Found in London Sewers
“Total creator. Devoted tv fanatic. Communicator. Evil pop culture buff. Social media advocate.”
