a Yes Contradicts the fact that associates who are members of the governing bodies of trade unions or employers in the health sector are not eligible for membership in Ordem dos Médicos.
For Principal Jorge Roque da Cunha, the government’s proposal goes “in an unacceptable direction and bans blindly, and does not see the appropriateness or quality of a solution that would, for example, prohibit an associate from exercising functions in one of the faculties of a specialization system.”
The official asserts that this body is “merely an advisory one of a technical-scientific nature,” so he does not understand why “it cannot hold a position as a member of a trade union body of a strict supervisory or disciplinary nature, or even supervision or advisory.”
SIM also condemns the fact that there has been little time to analyze the bill amending the statutes of public professional associations. “It is a diploma with 44 very wide-ranging items that affect, cancel, modify, add and develop 16 other items for about 500 dense pages of text”, in a statement.
He adds: “Even if we go beyond its legal scope, without this disrespect to delineate trade union functions and responsibilities and responsibilities, we publicly express our concern about Destroy the guarantors of OM’s artistic independence. “
The unionist structure notes that in other socialist governments the “fundamental milestones” in the medical profession have been overcome and wonders whether it would be with the current legislature that “To witness an unspeakable setback in the technical independence of the medical profession.”
Text: Maria Joao Garcia
Related news
The command platform puts “SNS at risk,” says FNAM
Emily Brontë is a journalist and feature writer specialising in culture, entertainment, literature, and current affairs. She is dedicated to producing clear, accurate reporting that helps readers stay informed about developments in the UK and around the world.
