NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
The British government wants Prince Charles His comments on the new policy for asylum seekers have backfired and he has withdrawn from politics, according to a statement.
Charles, 73, described his criticism of the policy of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda as “terrible” and Downing Street responded that such a suspension would be “dangerous.” Constitutional issues The Sunday Times reports that he once ascended the throne.
An unnamed senior government official told the newspaper: “Prince Charles is the darling of our public life, but it would not be attractive if he tried to act the same way when he was king. That would raise serious constitutional questions.
According to the official, there are differences between British royalty The Commonwealth should walk behind closed doors.
“Many of your comments on architecture and horticulture are interesting and I will always be happy to hear them in person. But it’s very different from him making public interventions like a king, “the official told The Times.” Most of us do not know what the queen’s genius is, what she thinks. “
Another government official, who did not want to be named, said he would stop making such comments with King Charles.
“Such interference will be tolerated when he is prince of Wales, and it will not be true when he is king,” the official told the Times.
Draw an additional contrast between Charles and Queen Elizabeth II, Another employee said: “The problem with Charles is that he thinks he should be interesting, and he thinks people are interested in what he thinks. He seems to have misunderstood the character.”
Charles had previously said that he was “very disappointed” by the law that physically transferred asylum seekers to Rwanda, despite being confirmed by the country’s Supreme Court.
According to the Times, a feud between them British Prime Minister Boris Johnson The cabinet and members of the royal family were the result of an initial meeting between the two leaders.
During the meeting, the lawmaker reported that Johnson had expressed “disrespectful” behavior to Charles, saying he was “uncomfortable with the timing” and “Charles could not accept the delay.”
The British royal family issued a statement making it clear that Charles would act “politically impartially” in obtaining the throne from his mother.
Charles had previously said he would act “within constitutional standards” when he was king just because he was “not so stupid” for violating British law.
“Total creator. Devoted tv fanatic. Communicator. Evil pop culture buff. Social media advocate.”